Conflicted rewatch number three...
Apr. 11th, 2009 11:26 pmSpoilers for conflicted--a Reid fangirl observation, and a question...
How cute! I am rewatching Conflicted again, and realized that Spencer actually shook Julie's hand! He touched her! I went back, and it's sort of adorable. He lifts his hand, gives a tiny wave and says hi... then realizes she's already gone in for the shake and switches to take her hand. Poor w00bie can't be rude. Couldn't see his face directly after, but he lifts his opposite hand to his face from what you can see. I can just imagine the poor guy chewing his nails briefly, like "fuck, I just had to fucking touch someone... ewww, human contact". *gigglesnort*
The question, though, and they never explained this, I don't think...
When they give the profile, they say that the male partner is someone who's submissive in life to everyone but the female partner, with which he is dominant. Then they say the female partner is also submissive, of average intelligence, and emotionally unstable. "Look for women who are reclusive, have a problem with authorities, and can't interact with dominant personalities."
Um... firstly, they never talk any of that out, so the parts about the female partner feel a little out of nowhere. Maybe it was an editing for time problem?
I can sort of see the part about the male, as often the unsubs are submissive in RL, and use the murder to feel the control they surrender in real life. However, I don't get how they're coming to the conclusion that the woman is submissive and reclusive, when she is the one doing the hunting of these men, or emotionally unstable (yes, she's helping a murderer/rapist and that's not exactly sane, but they didn't call the murderer/rapist unstable, so it felt like a distinction). And if she can't interact with a dominant personality, how can she tolerate her partner being dominant with her?
Maybe I'm missing something? O.o
How cute! I am rewatching Conflicted again, and realized that Spencer actually shook Julie's hand! He touched her! I went back, and it's sort of adorable. He lifts his hand, gives a tiny wave and says hi... then realizes she's already gone in for the shake and switches to take her hand. Poor w00bie can't be rude. Couldn't see his face directly after, but he lifts his opposite hand to his face from what you can see. I can just imagine the poor guy chewing his nails briefly, like "fuck, I just had to fucking touch someone... ewww, human contact". *gigglesnort*
The question, though, and they never explained this, I don't think...
When they give the profile, they say that the male partner is someone who's submissive in life to everyone but the female partner, with which he is dominant. Then they say the female partner is also submissive, of average intelligence, and emotionally unstable. "Look for women who are reclusive, have a problem with authorities, and can't interact with dominant personalities."
Um... firstly, they never talk any of that out, so the parts about the female partner feel a little out of nowhere. Maybe it was an editing for time problem?
I can sort of see the part about the male, as often the unsubs are submissive in RL, and use the murder to feel the control they surrender in real life. However, I don't get how they're coming to the conclusion that the woman is submissive and reclusive, when she is the one doing the hunting of these men, or emotionally unstable (yes, she's helping a murderer/rapist and that's not exactly sane, but they didn't call the murderer/rapist unstable, so it felt like a distinction). And if she can't interact with a dominant personality, how can she tolerate her partner being dominant with her?
Maybe I'm missing something? O.o
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:48 am (UTC)You know, like Rossi does when he wants Moochi to go get the bird. Except without the weird sexual aspect.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:51 am (UTC)LOL! Rossi should get Muchie to go fetch Reid for him. They can figure out their own sexual aspect. >.>
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:02 am (UTC)I think that we are supposed to assume that since her dominant partner isn't dominant all the time, the female partner is supposed to be more okay with it. I kind of thought of it more as someone changing once you started to date them. Like, once the guy realized that the woman was submissive enough that he would be the dominant, he decided to start stepping up the dominant behavior to see how much she would take.
I think they meant she had more of a problem with dominant personalities when she was supposed to be interacting on a level where they were more equalish. The example of Adam shying away from Morgan brings to mind at least two female friends that really don't like talking to men in positions of authority but have no problem either talking to woman or people that they view as harmless (little old men).
I think they didn't necessarily do a good job of giving examples of what they meant, especially since most people are going to be nervous and awkward when talking to the police during a murder investigation. Even more so if Rossi is going to yell at them. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:05 am (UTC)OMG. Never look at this ep the same way again. Nice call!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:10 am (UTC)That's so totally my dog.
Oh yes, my dog.
After all, dog is GOD spelled backward...
Now, if only I had a pic of my pup...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:15 am (UTC)Like the Manson family, where Manson had the women go out and lure in men with sex, I think they called it "flirty-fishing", to come join the family. The women wouldn't necessarily have done that on their own, without orders, unless they had been absolutely certain it was something he would have wanted and approved of, like a gift to him, the way some of the girls carved x's on their foreheads after seeing he had done so in court.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 06:14 am (UTC)Although, people have interesting suggestions in the comments :-)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 07:02 pm (UTC)