Disabling comments poll on
criminalxminds. FOR THE LOVE OF ALL
Nov. 17th, 2009 12:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For any of you Criminal Minds people who care about personal choice, please go vote NO on this poll.
My reasoning here, but there are many other good points made as well.
I can't BELIEVE how many people are voting yes. I actually really pisses me off. They are talking about not only deleting posts, but BANNING people as well, over something that should be completely up to the poster's discretion.
ETA:
sodoesracheal puts it more succinctly than I do: "Moderator of a community and ruler of a community are two different things. Some people have legitimate reasons for disabling comments. Taking the choice away is wrong."
And you know, I think this is what gets down to what bothers me the most about this. I can't even remember the last time I posted fic to that comm, and to the best of my knowledge I have never disabled comments there either. I haven't seen the point yet. Yet even as someone the rule would have never affected as of yet, allowing comments or not on a post that is not offensive is a personal choice (just as deciding whether or not to click a link to a discussion held elsewhere is), and taking away our choice is wrong and abuse of power by the mods.
ETA2: Fuck it. This is all just going to get wanky if I keep replying. I am angered by a couple comments made, but I have no interest in wank.
Vote NO. IJS.
My reasoning here, but there are many other good points made as well.
I can't BELIEVE how many people are voting yes. I actually really pisses me off. They are talking about not only deleting posts, but BANNING people as well, over something that should be completely up to the poster's discretion.
ETA:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And you know, I think this is what gets down to what bothers me the most about this. I can't even remember the last time I posted fic to that comm, and to the best of my knowledge I have never disabled comments there either. I haven't seen the point yet. Yet even as someone the rule would have never affected as of yet, allowing comments or not on a post that is not offensive is a personal choice (just as deciding whether or not to click a link to a discussion held elsewhere is), and taking away our choice is wrong and abuse of power by the mods.
ETA2: Fuck it. This is all just going to get wanky if I keep replying. I am angered by a couple comments made, but I have no interest in wank.
Vote NO. IJS.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:10 pm (UTC)Clearly some people cant wrap their minds around that. You ban people based on the kind of comments and post they make, if they are jerks, flamers, troublemakers, not for disabling comments. Christ *facepalm*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:21 pm (UTC)And since you're still a member, go vote! :D
Btw, icon love. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:55 pm (UTC)Oh, and the icon is a quote from The West Wing : )
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:34 pm (UTC)I think that's ridiculous. Why would someone want comments to a story on an announcement post in a comm? Every other comm that allows fic announcement posts ALSO allows comments to be disabled (AFAIK) so that comments are left on the actual story post. And banning someone for doing so, in a post that really isn't inviting discussion in the first place, is totally ridiculous and screams "power hungry mod."
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:11 pm (UTC)*eep*
The whole thing just feels silly and unnecessary to me. On the other hand, I don't spend a lot of time in that comm anyway, so maybe this is a SERIOUS PROBLEM THAT IS RUINING THE INTERNET FOR EVERYONE and I just haven't noticed.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:26 pm (UTC)I've never understood people who comment on link-posts. I mean, maybe if it's a link to a discussion post, but what's with people who comment on fic announcements? Didn't they have to click the link to read the fic? So why not comment on that page if they were there already?
Though, the vibe I'm getting from that mod is that she's not really a big fan of the link-posts anyway, so maybe it's this or have a ban placed on link posts all together *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:32 pm (UTC)I guess I was more just thinking that if you posted even the initial question in the announcement post - like "I'm having a discussion in my journal about whether Hotch and Haley should get back together" (which seems to be a question that's floating around lately) - then people could comment in the announcement post with ZOMG TOTES! or EW NEVER! without actually reading the post. People can't really respond to a fic without having read it, I mean, unless they're just trying to be nice or something. That's where my confusion comes from.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 10:47 pm (UTC)I feel like none of the discussion going on at the moment is particularly productive, but hey, it's her comm, it's her party. (Actually I didn't know it was her comm until this whole thing happened; ablackpanther is the only one I've noticed making any modly posts there. But again, that could be my lack of observation).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 11:55 pm (UTC)She really didn't need to be as snarky to you as she was. I think she just needs to step back and take a breathe for a moment.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 11:57 pm (UTC)I just love how the people that are for the rule are acting like the ones against is are going to suddenly start raping and pillaging the internets.
MASS PANDEMONIUM IS ON THE HORIZON
no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 02:03 am (UTC)*clings*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 03:14 am (UTC)